Posts Tagged ‘CO2’

Vacationing and taking stock of eco unfriendly behavior

February 23rd, 2010

It is a new week and we are one step further in our year long journey of going green.  This week’s green challenge is to look at eco friendly activities I can do while on vacation.  We are going to visit my mother in San Diego soon and want to make sure that we are continuing on our process of reducing our impact.  We are also spending a little time in LA.  I think it wise to admit to the waste that I know we are going to produce as a result of the trip. Today’s post is a pre-audit of the eco-unfriendly things we will do while on our trip.

The Plane Trip – The plane trip will emit CO2.  According to Terrapass, we will use about 3,160 lbs of CO2 just for the plane trip.  I pretty much have to fly there if I am going, so it is waste I will just have to put up with.

Car Rental – We will be renting a car while we are there.  Although it is only for a few days and an economy car, we will be driving more than we usually do.

Lack of recycling – Once we get to my mother’s house, we will be able to easily recycle, but I am not sure how easy it will be easy for us to recycle while in Los Angeles.  I know that CA is a bit more ecofriendly than many parts of the world, so who knows.  I am just guessing that I will throw away something that I would usually recycle.

I am not going to stop going on vacation to be environmentally friendly, but I can try to take stock of the waste I am creating and work to reduce it.  If you have any ideas that would be easy to implement, please let me know in the comment area below.

  • Share/Bookmark

Green Companies Exercise

January 22nd, 2010

I am going to do a little challenge with myself.  I want to list some companies that I believe are green.  After that, I will research these companies to see what they do, if anything, to be green.  It will be interesting to see if what I believe is actually true.  I will not select companies in this exercise that I know make green products because that would be obvious.

Here is my list:  Lexus (automakers), Sun Chips, Renold’s (aluminum foil), Shape (magazine), Starbucks, and DELL.

Ok, I must admit some of these companies were brands that I selected by glancing around the room, but that will make it fun to learn something new.

1.  I heard something about Lexus going green but I don’t remember what it was.  What I learned from their website is that they reuse scraps from cushions and liners as sound insulation.  They reduce water and energy usage and have a zero landfill waste status.  They reduce, reuse or recycle 98 percent of all manufacturing leftovers.  They even plan reduce their energy consumption even more by 18% in 2011 when compared to 2001.

2. SunChips: what I understand about this company is that they are making their packaging compostable and that they run on wind energy.  I was correct in the compostable wrappers guess.  Also, 33% of every 10 1/2 oz bag of chips is made with renewable, plant based materials.  In 2010, on Earth Day,  they are set to release their first fully compostable bag, that will decompose in 14 weeks. They also helped rebuild Greensburg Kansas that was once destroyed by a tornado in a green way.  Solar power is one main source of energy in the production of SunChips.  That is a big step to a healthier planet.

3.   Reynold’s:  I seen a commercial advertising a recycled Reynold’s product.  It looks like their foil is 100% recycled aluminum and even the paperboard is 100% recycled.  After doing some more browsing on their site I found a Greening Your Kitchen tab including tips on going green from Sara Snow.  My only suggestion is that they should make these links easier to find instead of having to dig around.

4.  Shape: I am a subscriber to this magazine so I appreciate all of the green tips throughout.  Instead of finding information online, I actually dug out my new copy and read their statement at the beginning.  They state that they are the top user of recycled content for any North American women’s lifestyle magazine.  They average 305,000 pounds of post consumer waste is used and that saves 17,723 trees.

5.  Starbucks: I know that Starbucks sells fair trade coffee but I was wondering if they did more than that.  Their website is actually pretty cool.  They have videos and ways to interact with the site.  They support the local community, they encourage the use of ceramic or reusable mugs, they use LED energy efficient lighting, recycled materials, and building materials and they also allow you to take home used coffee grounds for your soil.

6.  Dell: Dell offers free computer recycling to worldwide customers; they recovered 100 million pounds in 2007 alone.  You can also donate your computer to underprivileged children and adults.  This is awesome; on their site they track how much CO2 they avoided, which is updated every other second.  So far they are at 41,202,094 tons.    During the year 2009 they completed 88 energy efficiency tasks from changing their light bulbs, temperature adjustments and upgrading their HVAC systems.

This is quite an interesting bit of information and I am glad I completed this exercise.  Learning what companies are doing to go green will help us select which changes we want to make.   Since this is part of Ben’s challenge, he will in the end select which company we will trade in our traditional purchases with a more green selection.   Are you purchasing from companies specifically because they are green over their non-green competitor?  Please leave us a comment below.

  • Share/Bookmark

Why should I turn off the lights?

December 10th, 2009

I have been trying to follow the rules of this week’s green challenge by turning off all lights when I leave a room and I understand that it saves energy, but I think it would be a good exercise to find out specifically why this is a good idea.  “Save energy” is such a broad term and it seems to help me to take a look at specific reasons why I should be turning off lights to save energy.

One of the most common ways electricity is created is by burning fossil fuels.  When fossil fuels, such as coal, oil or natural gas, carbon dioxide is released into the air and that is the nasty stuff that leads to global warming.  So, by keeping the lights on when you are not using them is just an exercise in wastefulness.  To turn OFF those same lights is an expression of conservation and only using what you need.

How big of a difference does this make?  Although I usually really like doing the math, I am going to rely on other people’s math today.  A 60 Watt light bulb consumes .06 Kilowatt hours of electricity.  If I can prevent this light bulb from being on 3 additional hours by turning off the light when I am not using it, this adds up to .18 kWh, or about 66kWh per year.  According to this site, 1 kWh of electricity generated from coal creates 1-3 pounds of CO2.  A simple step such as turning off a light saves 66-198 pounds of CO2 per year.  If you start talking about households where lights are left on all the time, I suppose the potential waste can get into the thousands of pounds.

This is such a small step and such a big reward for our planet.  Let me know if you have any other interesting information on the subject in the comment area below.

  • Share/Bookmark